More than 60 percent of cancer patients are older adults — and that will rise to 70 percent by 2040. Yet seniors continue to be underrepresented in clinical trials, making it difficult to assess how treatments are likely to help or harm them.
The newest evidence of the problem comes from a Food and Drug Administration analysis, which found that only 40 percent of patients participating in cancer clinical trials were 65 and older. The analysis, which has not yet been published, was presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology’s annual meeting in June.
Clinical trials investigate the safety and effectiveness of new drugs and therapies, as well as ways to prevent illness and detect conditions early. Their discoveries help guide medical practice.
Yet, older adults are often not included in research studies to any significant extent. This is especially true for cancer patients in their 70s and 80s, according to the FDA’s data:
- While 19 percent of breast cancer patients are 75 or older, only 4 percent of breast cancer clinical trial participants are of this age.
- Although 33 percent of colon cancer patients are in the 75-and-up group, a mere 8 percent of patients studied by researchers fell in that age group.
- While 37 percent of lung cancer patients are 75 or older, only 9 percent of people of that age are represented in lung cancer clinical trials.
The sobering conclusion: “It’s difficult to practice evidence-based medicine in an older population because the data isn’t there,” said Dr. Stuart Lichtman, professor of medicine at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City and president of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology.
And it’s not just cancer. Across medical conditions that disproportionately affect seniors, people 65 and older have a poor showing in clinical trials.
“There’s often an assumption that drugs only need to be tested in younger people and results can be extrapolated,” said Dr. Consuelo Wilkins, an associate professor of medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center who, with colleagues, is overseeing a major grant to help bring more seniors, blacks, Hispanics and other groups into clinical trials. “But we know that how older adults respond to medications and interventions and their risk for adverse events is different based on their physiology.”
Difficulties enrolling older people in research studies extend to Alzheimer’s disease. With National Institutes of Health research funding now at nearly $1.4 billion a year, “we’re going to be seeing more and more clinical trials, but it’s already difficult to get enough people to participate,” said Keith Fargo, director of scientific programs at the Alzheimer’s Association.
Fewer than one-third of people diagnosed with Alzheimer’s are eligible to join clinical trials, he said.
Navigating Aging focuses on medical issues and advice associated with aging and end-of-life care, helping America’s 45 million seniors and their families navigate the health care system.
To contact Judith with a question or comment, click here.
For more KHN coverage of aging, click here.
Researchers often find older adults unsuitable for trials for multiple reasons: Seniors may have multiple illnesses — diabetes and hypertension, as well as cancer or Alzheimer’s disease — that could complicate the study’s results, or they may be taking several medications already that could interact with therapies being examined.
Also, older adults may live alone, and not have someone who can accompany them to the study site for tests and procedures — a significant concern for Alzheimer’s trials, which typically require a caregiver to provide input about the patient’s condition and progress. Or, seniors can’t get around easily. Or they’re frail.
Responsibility falls to a large extent on physicians, said Dr. Richard Schilsky, chief medical officer for ASCO, noting “they don’t ask older adults whether they want to participate or not. It’s a combination of concern that older patients might be unable to comply with a trial’s requirements, which are usually quite rigorous, and concern that specified therapies might be too toxic.”
Two years ago, ASCO issued new recommendations calling for older adults to be included in more clinical trials. But progress has been slow, acknowledged Dr. Hyman Muss, director of geriatric oncology at the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill.
“My view is that every patient I see, if they’re eligible for a clinical trial I’ll tell them about it,” he said.
Don’t assume your doctor will be equally forthcoming. “Absolutely, you should take the initiative and ask,” Schilsky recommended. And don’t assume you need to have run out of options before doing so. “Clinical trials aren’t just for people who have no treatment options left — that’s a common misconception,” Schilsky said.This KHN story can be republished for free (details).
Debbie Earp, 67, joined a trial at the Lineberger this year, after getting a diagnosis of stage 2 breast cancer in early January. Her responsibilities over the four-month study: wearing a Fitbit, tracking how much exercise she was getting on a daily basis, and filling out a questionnaire about how she was feeling each time she got chemotherapy.
Earp said she agreed to participate because “I’ve always exercised and I felt, from a physical and psychological point of view, anything that was going to motivate me during treatment to exercise more would be a good idea.” The goal of the trial was to examine how physical activity affects older breast cancer patients’ response to chemotherapy.
Of course, clinical trials aren’t for everyone. Some older adults are reluctant to consider them because they’re skeptical of unproven therapies. Others may choose to focus on their quality of life instead of aggressive treatments.
There are good resources about clinical trials on the internet, if you know where to look. The National Institute on Aging has prepared materials for older adults, including a list of questions that seniors should ask before deciding whether to join a trial. The FDA has a patient-oriented site that delves into issues such as informed consent — making sure you’re fully informed about the potential benefits and harms of a research study, among other essential information.
For those who want to look for trials on their own, the NIH sponsors ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of studies across the world, searchable by disease and geography. Trials Today is an effort to make the NIH site more consumer-friendly, created at Vanderbilt University. ResearchMatch is another Vanderbilt effort where people who want to participate in studies can sign up and be matched with clinical trial sponsors. And TrialMatch is a one-stop-shop for clinical trials for people with Alzheimer’s disease, their caregivers, and people interested in preventing dementia, currently listing more than 250 scientific studies.
Make sure you run whatever prospects you find by your doctor. “Very few patients have the expertise to understand if a clinical trial is appropriate for them,” Schilsky said. “You really need an expert opinion to help you understand what you find.”
Update: This story was updated on July 21, 2017 to delete an extraneous word.
KHN’s coverage related to aging & improving care of older adults is supported by The John A. Hartford Foundation and its coverage of end-of-life and serious illness issues is supported by The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation.
Correction: A previous version of this story misstated the percentage of patients participating in cancer clinical trials who are 65 and older. The correct number is 40 percent.
Some elements may be removed from this article due to republishing restrictions. If you have questions about available photos or other content, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.