Congress Underfunds Federal Food Safety Effort
Officials at the Food and Drug Administration say the funding shortfall could undermine Congress’s intent when it passed a sweeping food safety law in 2010. Meanwhile, federal prosecutors urge a judge to punish two egg executives found responsible for a major 2010 salmonella outbreak.
The New York Times:
Food Safety Law’s Funding Is Far Below Estimated Requirement
After thousands of people were sickened by tainted eggs, peanut butter and spinach, Congress passed a sweeping food safety law in 2010 that gave the Food and Drug Administration new powers to prevent additional outbreaks. But lawmakers have not provided enough money for the mission. The Congressional Budget Office said the F.D.A. would need a total of $580 million from 2011 to 2015 to carry out the changes required by the Food Safety Modernization Act. So far, Congress has appropriated less than half of that amount, even as the agency is moving to issue crucial rules under the law this year. (Nixon, 4/7)
The Associated Press:
US Wants Egg Executives Punished For Salmonella Outbreak
A judge should consider the "widespread harm" done by a major 2010 salmonella outbreak and the food safety lapses that preceded it in sentencing two egg industry executives whose company was responsible, prosecutors said Monday. ... Jack DeCoster, 80, of Turner, Maine, and 51-year-old Peter DeCoster, of Clarion, Iowa are scheduled to be sentenced April 13 by U.S. District Judge Mark Bennett in a federal courtroom in Sioux City, Iowa. Both pleaded guilty last year to introducing adulterated eggs into interstate commerce and face up to one year in jail. (Foley, 4/6)
And some scientists question the government's recommendations on consumption of salt -
The Washington Post:
More Scientists Doubt Salt Is As Bad For You As The Government Says
For years, the federal government has advised Americans that they are eating too much salt, and that this excess contributes yearly to the deaths of tens of thousands of people. But unknown to many shoppers urged to buy foods that are “low sodium” and “low salt,” this longstanding warning has come under assault by scientists who say that typical American salt consumption is without risk. (Whoriskey, 4/7)
The Washington Post:
How To Know When Diet Advice Is Worth It
[D]espite the proliferation of claims that one diet or another is “proven,” actually determining how eating influences health is famously challenging. Salt is a case in point. To study medical issues, scientists prefer to arrange randomized controlled trials, or RCTs. When it comes to long-term diet questions, though, these can be all but impossible to conduct. (Whoriskey, 4/6)