The research exaggerates potential savings, cherry-picks evidence and downplays some of the potential trade-offs.
This claim ‘wouldn’t pass muster’ in a first-year statistics class.
There was a time when Bloomberg’s criticism was consistent.
It all comes down to how you define it.
Biden’s statement misses the mark because of messy math.
Caveat emptor. Some of these health insurance plans might prove helpful for some people, but making that determination is not easy.
A sampling of health policy highlights from the eighth Democratic presidential primary debate in Manchester, N.H.
In his Feb. 4 State of the Union address, President Donald Trump said the cost of extending health care to people regardless of their citizenship status would “bankrupt” the U.S.
We checked again. The data has not changed.
But like all of health care, it’s complicated.
This one is a big stretch.
Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg uses health care as a key message in his Democratic presidential primary run. Now that he will be taking the stage in the Feb. 19 debate, the message could take on even more prominence.
The claim, which builds on previous statements and campaign messaging, drew strong reactions.
Democratic presidential candidates also returned to now-familiar themes in debating the differences between “Medicare for All” and more incremental reforms.
Calculations are complicated, but correct.
The impact of the Trump administration’s health policies is not as clear-cut as the president’s reelection campaign suggests.
These numbers are stark.
‘Medication insecurity’ is a thing.
Candidates again sparred over “Medicare for All” and other approaches to health reform — but this time they waited more than two hours before wading into health policy issues.
The pharmaceutical industry’s argument that capping drug prices would compromise drug innovation stands “on very shaky ground.”